Illinois
Speaker of the House, Michael Madigan presided over a House Pension
Committee meeting that began at 1:00 PM Thursday (5/16/2013) afternoon. The Speaker
called the special meeting to work with community colleges and
universities to advance a plan to shift the employer costs of pensions
from the state to the employer universities and community colleges.
The
hour long meeting featured testimony from community college and
university representatives. Testifying for community colleges were Tom
Ryder (ICCTA Legislative Counsel), Charlotte Warren (President, Lincoln
Land Community College) and Laurent Pernot (Vice Chancellor, City
Colleges of Chicago). Testifying for universities were Bob Easter,
(President, University of Illinois) and Glen Poshard (President,
Southern Illinois University). School district representatives did not
participate in this meeting.
The
testimony centered on a recent cost shifting proposal from the Speaker.
That proposal provides that community colleges and universities will
shift the employer cost of pensions from the state to universities and
community colleges at the rate of 0.5% of pensionable payroll per year
until the entire amount is shifted. This is similar to the ICCTA
proposal and is estimated to take 13 years to shift the pension costs.
Complicated cost control measures are in place to protect the community
colleges and universities from future unfunded liabilities or pension
enhancements that the General Assembly may be tempted to provide.
The
proposal also requires that both the local community college or
university board and the SURS Board approve of any new pension
enhancements approved by the General Assembly. Under this provision it
is entirely possible that Community College A would approve a benefit
enhancement and Community College B would not approve. After a period
of years it is possible that the pension plan could differ from one
community college to another. The normal cost amount that each
community college and university is paying would be adjusted as each
may choose to enhance benefits or reject the enhancements.
The
Speaker’s pension cost shifting proposal also provides for
reconstituting the State Universities Retirement System Board in such a
way that there would be three board members from the community college
system and three board members from the university system serving on
the new board. The chair would be selected from among the membership.
Currently there is no guaranteed representation from the community
college system.
All
of the presenters indicated that cost shifting will be difficult to
achieve but is necessary to stabilize the pension funds and the state’s
budget situation. The presenters were generally favorable toward the
Speaker’s proposal. Community college testimony detailed the need to
address remedies in the following areas of interest: 1) Improve the
Tier II pension plan; 2) remove pensionable salary caps; 3) revise the
“6% Rule”; 4) provide level state funding; 5) reduce age 67 retirement;
and 6) several other suggestions were made.
Members
of the Pension Committee asked questions about the proposal. No vote
was taken on the measure and the Speaker announced that there would be
another meeting next week to continue the dialogue.
Michael Monaghan
Executive Director
Illinois Community College Trustees Association
(24,046)
(24,046)
What an incredible mess! I am glad that community colleges will be represented from here on out. What were there other suggestions which were made?
ReplyDeleteIs it really prudent that, in the future, pension plans could differ from one community college to the next? This seems to present the possibility of diluting the strength of unions in community colleges, as well as creates an even more complex labrynthine mess.
Who were those who did not generally approve or least what and why did they not approve of certain aspects of this proposal?
Number 4: "provide level state funding": What does this mean?
Thanks for the update.